Manoj Karwa
Publications by Manoj Karwa
2 publications found • Active 2011-2013
2013
1 publicationBioequivalence Study of Two Formulations of Bisoprolol Fumarate Tablets in Healthy Subjects
The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of Diopolol (containing Bisoprolol fumarate 10 mg) tablet of SAVA Healthcare Ltd, India with Concore (Containing Bisoprolol hemifumarate 10 mg) tablet of Merck Serono, Germany in healthy adult volunteers. This open label, balanced, single-dose, randomized, two period, two sequences ,crossover oral bioequivalence study was conducted in 24 healthy human adult male subjects under fasting condition. Subjects received bisoprolol 10 mg of either test or reference formulation with a washout period of 7 days. After study drug administration, serial blood samples were collected over a period of 48 hours. The plasma concentrations of bisoprolol were determined by a validated method using LC/MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, Tmax, T1/2, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, and kel, were determined for both the formulations. The formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if the geometric least square mean ratio of test and reference of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞, were within the predetermined bioequivalence range of 80% to 125%. A total of 24 subjects were enrolled. No significant differences were found based on analysis of variance. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞, of bisoprolol were 103.29 - 115.15, 103.73 - 116.62, and 94.78 - 116.64 respectively This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for bisoprolol.
2011
1 publicationCOMPARATIVE BIOAVAILABILITY OF TWO LOSARTAN FORMULATIONS IN HEALTHY HUMAN VOLUNTEERS AFTER A SINGLE DOSE ADMINISTRATION
 The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of test and reference losartan potassium 50 mg formulations in healthy volunteers. This open label, balanced, single-dose, randomized, 2-period, crossover oral bioequivalence study was conducted in 54 healthy human adult subjects under fasting condition. Subjects received losartan 50 mg of either test or reference formulation with a washout period of 7 days. After study drug administration, serial blood samples were collected over a period of 48 hours. The plasma concentrations of losartan and its active metabolite were determined by a validated method using LC/MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, Tmax, t1/2, AUC0-t, AUC 0-∞, and kel, were determined for both the formulations. The formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if the log-transformed ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were within the predetermined bioequivalence range of 80% to 125%. A total of 54 subjects were enrolled. No significant differences were found based on analysis of variance. The mean values and 90% confidence intervals (CI) of test/reference ratios for these parameters of losartan as follows: Cmax 274.90 Vs 286.93 ng/mL (83.95 -113.69); AUC0-t 434.67 Vs 438.68 ng.hr/mL (93.30 -104.03); and AUC0-∞ 463.23 Vs 464.71 ng.hr/mL (94.65 -104.80) and for its active metabolite (losartan carboxylic acid) the mean values and 90% CI of test/reference ratios for these parameters as follows: Cmax 572.63 Vs 543.82 ng/mL (96.87-109.37); AUC0-t 3987.89 Vs 4051.07 ng.hr/mL (93.48-104.22); and AUC0-∞ 4215.58 Vs 4271.67 ng.hr/mL (94.84-105.26). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for losartan and its main active metabolite.  Key Words: Bioequivalence, Losartan, losartan carboxylic acid, Pharmacokinetics.
